Skip to main content

HARO and PR

Life After HARO: A 2026 PR Playbook

The MarquIQ Team7 min read1,380 words

HARO sunset in 2024. For years it was the cleanest way for founders to land quotes in tier-one publications without a PR retainer. Its successor Connectively shut down months later. The replacements are here; the pitch format is evolving; founders who get this right early are the ones who end up in the Forbes pieces next quarter.

The post-HARO landscape

Three platforms now carry most of the journalist-sourced-quote traffic:

  • Featured.com: highest question volume. Clean pitch interface. Pitch count per month drives visibility.
  • Qwoted: higher-quality journalists, lower volume. Tier-one publications pitch here. Subscription-gated.
  • Terkel: marketing and small-business lean. Useful for founders pitching B2B SaaS topics.

Running all three is the norm for founders doing PR seriously. The overlap is minimal; each platform sources from a different set of journalists.

Comparing the three main HARO successors as of Q2 2026.
PlatformVolumeQualityPriceBest for
Featured.comHigh (40+ queries/day)MidFreemium, paid tier unlocks more pitchesVolume pitching
QwotedLow (5-10/day)HighPaid subscriptionTier-one placements
TerkelMedium (15/day)MidFreeB2B SaaS and marketing

Start on Featured.com free tier. Add Terkel (free) within the first month. Layer Qwoted in once you have published work to point to as social proof.

What a winning pitch looks like

Journalists receive dozens of pitches per query. Most are generic. The ones that get picked share three properties:

  1. Specific to the query: references the exact angle the journalist is pursuing, not just the topic.
  2. Evidence-based: a concrete number, example, or story. Not "we've seen this often" but "across 12 SaaS products we ran last quarter, 38 percent saw X."
  3. Quotable: at least one sentence the journalist can drop straight in without rewriting.

The template that still works

Opening line that answers the specific question. One paragraph of evidence. A quotable sentence or two. Signature with title and credibility. Never more than 200 words.

Where automation helps

Automation shines at two steps: surfacing queries that actually match your expertise, and drafting an opening pitch grounded in your product context. Both are tedious. Both are where founders quit.

  • Query matching: autonomous systems can scan every Featured.com query against your product facts and surface the 5 percent that fit. Without this, you are scrolling 40 queries a day and picking by eye.
  • Draft generation: the draft can cite product numbers, customer examples, and the technical details you have already documented internally.

What never to automate

Submission. The final human review is what keeps the pitch honest. The cost of a misrepresented number or a claim that falls apart on fact-checking is your credibility with that journalist forever.

Every pitch that leaves your account needs a human approval. Automation gets you from 40 queries to a drafted pitch in 5 minutes; the last 30 seconds is yours to own.

See autonomous marketing for where PR fits into the broader loop, and why AI content fails for the voice guardrails that apply here too.

Frequently asked questions

What happened to HARO?

Cision sunset HARO (Help a Reporter Out) in 2024 and redirected subscribers to its paid successor, Connectively, which itself shut down later that year. The working replacements are Featured.com, Qwoted, and Terkel.

What is the best HARO alternative?

Featured.com has the broadest question volume and the cleanest pitch interface. Qwoted has higher-quality journalists but fewer questions. Terkel leans marketing and small-business. Running all three is the norm for founders doing PR seriously.

Is it worth pitching to these services?

Yes, for founders with genuine expertise in a specific domain. A single quote in a tier-one publication can outperform months of content. For founders without domain expertise, the pitch-to-placement ratio is rough.

Can I automate HARO pitches?

The draft can be automated; the submission should not be. A human needs to verify the pitch is honest and specific to the query. Journalists filter out generic AI pitches faster than anyone.

Stop missing HARO-style windows.

MarquIQ watches Featured.com, Qwoted, and Terkel for queries that match your expertise and drafts a pitch from your product context. You approve and submit.

See HARO automation

Share

Written by The MarquIQ Team

We build autonomous marketing infrastructure for solo SaaS founders. Every post here is grounded in what we see running MarquIQ against real products in production.

Product and engineering